Arkansas ATLAS · three-year trends for every school and district
District

Arkansas School for the Deaf and Blind

Pulaski County · Pulaski County Schools
Enrollment
136
2025-26
Free/Reduced lunch
47.1%
2025-26 · CEP district, compare with care
English learners
5.1%
2025-26 · MSI
Special education
98.5%
2025-26 · MSI
Attendance rate
not published
no published figure
Graduation rate
not published
no published figure
!
Spring 2026 figures are Pre-Appeals. ADE has not yet run the appeals and corrections cycle for this release, so these numbers can still change. At this stage ADE's statewide total also runs slightly above the sum of its own districts (between +0.006% and +0.184% depending on the subject), because some test records are not yet attributed to a school. Spring 2024 and Spring 2025, both final releases, reconcile exactly. How we handle this.

Three-year trajectory

Where students landed

The headline number only counts Levels 3 and 4. Movement from Level 1 to Level 2 is real progress that the headline hides, so the full distribution is shown. Above each bar, ▲ is the share ready or exceeding (Levels 3–4); below it, ▼ is the share in need of support or close (Levels 1–2).

Compared with

Every figure below is ADE's own published figure for that grain — not a total we computed by adding up schools.

Position statewide

The whole distribution, with this district marked. We report a quartile band rather than a precise rank: across a field this tight, a rank implies a precision the data does not support.

Districts like this one

Comparing a district only with the state average tells you as much about who enrolls there as about what it does. These are the 12 closest districts by economic disadvantage, size, English-learner share, special-education share and district configuration.

SubjectThis district, 2026Peer medianDifferencePeers used
ELA7.5%35.9%-28.4pp12
Reading10.1%37.0%-26.9pp12
Math3.2%41.2%-38.0pp12
Science6.3%41.6%-35.3pp12
Algebra0.0%32.5%-32.5pp11
Biology10.0%35.9%-25.9pp10

12 nearest districts in the same district configuration, by rank-normalized distance over economically-disadvantaged % (MSI), log enrollment (SIS), English-learner % (MSI) and special-education % (MSI), equally weighted. Peer medians are computed, not published by ADE; peers below 30 tested students are excluded and counted above.

54% econ. dis.
368 students
2% EL
20% SPED
44% econ. dis.
458 students
6% EL
17% SPED
57% econ. dis.
644 students
4% EL
22% SPED
51% econ. dis.
544 students
1% EL
24% SPED
54% econ. dis.
645 students
2% EL
20% SPED
56% econ. dis.
598 students
4% EL
17% SPED
59% econ. dis.
369 students
18% EL
17% SPED
45% econ. dis.
397 students
1% EL
22% SPED
56% econ. dis.
583 students
6% EL
16% SPED
58% econ. dis.
654 students
8% EL
17% SPED
46% econ. dis.
430 students
1% EL
20% SPED
59% econ. dis.
626 students
2% EL
20% SPED