Arkansas ATLAS · three-year trends for every school and district
District

Two Rivers School District

Yell County · Arch Ford Education Service Cooperative
Enrollment
584
2025-26
Free/Reduced lunch
81.2%
2025-26 · CEP district, compare with care
English learners
10.6%
2025-26 · MSI
Special education
28.8%
2025-26 · MSI
Attendance rate
91.2%
2024-25 — most recent published
Graduation rate
88.6%
2024-25 — most recent published
!
Spring 2026 figures are Pre-Appeals. ADE has not yet run the appeals and corrections cycle for this release, so these numbers can still change. At this stage ADE's statewide total also runs slightly above the sum of its own districts (between +0.006% and +0.184% depending on the subject), because some test records are not yet attributed to a school. Spring 2024 and Spring 2025, both final releases, reconcile exactly. How we handle this.

Three-year trajectory

Where students landed

The headline number only counts Levels 3 and 4. Movement from Level 1 to Level 2 is real progress that the headline hides, so the full distribution is shown. Above each bar, ▲ is the share ready or exceeding (Levels 3–4); below it, ▼ is the share in need of support or close (Levels 1–2).

Compared with

Every figure below is ADE's own published figure for that grain — not a total we computed by adding up schools.

Position statewide

The whole distribution, with this district marked. We report a quartile band rather than a precise rank: across a field this tight, a rank implies a precision the data does not support.

Districts like this one

Comparing a district only with the state average tells you as much about who enrolls there as about what it does. These are the 12 closest districts by economic disadvantage, size, English-learner share, special-education share and district configuration.

SubjectThis district, 2026Peer medianDifferencePeers used
ELA30.9%29.3%+1.6pp12
Reading31.2%32.0%-0.8pp12
Math31.1%31.9%-0.8pp12
Science31.3%32.5%-1.2pp12
Algebra27.5%31.1%-3.6pp8
Geometry28.2%13.3%+14.9pp9
Biology32.4%28.5%+3.9pp7

12 nearest districts in the same district configuration, by rank-normalized distance over economically-disadvantaged % (MSI), log enrollment (SIS), English-learner % (MSI) and special-education % (MSI), equally weighted. Peer medians are computed, not published by ADE; peers below 30 tested students are excluded and counted above.

65% econ. dis.
558 students
12% EL
19% SPED
86% econ. dis.
248 students
13% EL
20% SPED
70% econ. dis.
368 students
3% EL
18% SPED
58% econ. dis.
759 students
15% EL
20% SPED
92% econ. dis.
285 students
3% EL
20% SPED
88% econ. dis.
652 students
3% EL
18% SPED
75% econ. dis.
1,362 students
34% EL
19% SPED
57% econ. dis.
644 students
4% EL
22% SPED
71% econ. dis.
1,017 students
8% EL
17% SPED
58% econ. dis.
654 students
8% EL
17% SPED
89% econ. dis.
380 students
2% EL
23% SPED
59% econ. dis.
369 students
18% EL
17% SPED